Anonymity checkers
ipqualityscore.com
IPQualityScore describes fraud detection and user-validation tools for sites with users or transactions. The provider says each API request, lookup, or query deducts a query credit, while purchases of query packs and premium subscriptions are final and non-refundable, subject to applicable law. Buyers weighing screening coverage against metered use and contract terms have reason to check how the service fits their workflow before committing.
This may be relevant to media buyers handling user or transaction checks, though the right fit depends on the fields and integration their workflow requires.
Editorial review based on public sources, without hands-on testing; facts checked on 2026-10-31.
This page contains no partner link to this service.
- Logo
Each logo belongs to its owner and appears here only to help identify the service.- Name
- ipqualityscore.com
- Category
- Anonymity checkers
- Official site
- ipqualityscore.com · No link provided
- Facts checked
Fraud signals meet metered queries
The provider’s site and terms describe the following scope and account allowance, checked 2026-10-31.
- Intended use: sites with users or transactions (Features page, checked 2026-10-31).
- Free account: up to 1,000 lookups per month (About Us page, checked 2026-10-31).
- IP screening: proxy and VPN detection (homepage, checked 2026-10-31).
- Contact checks: email verification and phone validation (homepage, checked 2026-10-31).
- Device checks: fingerprinting for web and mobile apps (homepage, checked 2026-10-31).
IPQS combines validation and risk signals
IPQS says its scoring covers IP, email, phone, device, and address data, positioning the service around multiple kinds of user information rather than a single identifier. The provider also describes enriching fraud scores for IP, email, phone, and device risk across the user journey.
The stated scope extends beyond those scores: IPQS lists bot detection, email risk scoring, device fingerprinting, and phone number intelligence. It also says it evaluates over 300 data points and provides real-time fraud scores with additional risk analysis details. These are vendor descriptions, not independent evidence of how accurate a score is in a particular traffic mix.
API requests spend query credits
The terms tie query-credit use to activity: each API request, lookup, or query deducts one credit, except where expressly excluded. That makes the credit balance a practical usage constraint for workflows that send repeated checks; buyers should establish which calls, if any, qualify for an exception before estimating consumption.
For implementation, IPQS lists API integration, CSV uploads, and live lookup investigator tools. The provider also offers an API integration with examples. It says businesses can tailor custom rules and settings to their requirements, and describes real-time updates from its threat network.
The Features page names e-commerce, CMS, and affiliate platforms as integration contexts. A buyer should map the intended checks to the available integration route and confirm how custom rules interact with the chosen workflow.
Free lookups sit beside final purchases
IPQS presents several ways to start: its homepage offers a free trial and a demo, while its plans page invites users to start a free trial. These invitations are distinct from the provider’s description of a free account with a stated monthly lookup allowance.
The About Us page describes the free account as allowing up to 1,000 lookups per month. The provider’s terms say purchases of query packs and premium subscription plans are final and non-refundable, subject to applicable law.
Unused queries or subscription time do not receive refunds, rollovers, or proration, except where required by law, according to the Terms of Service. Before choosing a paid option, buyers should check the applicable terms for the purchase type and how expected query use fits the credit model.
Check the data path before relying
Before using a screening result in a decision, ask the provider what fields each response returns and how it presents them. In general, knowing the returned fields helps buyers decide whether those outputs fit the decision they need to make.
Ask what evidence informs each signal and how the provider handles collected data, including storage, sharing, and deletion. These details shape whether the data path fits the organization’s privacy requirements.
Clarify how paid tiers are priced and how trial access is controlled. In general, a clear account of limits and billing conditions makes it easier to compare expected use with the contract.
Screening spans IP, contact, and device data
The listed coverage brings several screening types into one service description, including proxy and VPN detection, email verification, phone validation, and device fingerprinting. Its stated scoring also spans IP, email, phone, device, and address data.
- The provider lists API integration, CSV uploads, and live lookup investigator tools.
- The homepage lists malicious URL and file malware scanning tools.
- IPQS describes dark web monitoring for tracking leaks.
- Its threat-intelligence feed scans IPs, email addresses, domains, and URLs for threats and suspicious behavior.
Credits and contract terms narrow flexibility
The Terms of Service set conditions on credits, refunds, termination, licensing, and sharing, checked 2026-10-31.
- Each API request, lookup, or query deducts one query credit unless expressly excluded.
- Query-pack and premium-subscription purchases are final and non-refundable, subject to applicable law, according to the Terms of Service.
- Unused queries and subscription time receive no refund, rollover, or proration except where required by law.
- A client may terminate with 30 days’ written notice, but remaining service-term fees become due and unused services are not refundable, according to the Terms of Service.
- The license is non-exclusive, non-transferable, and non-sublicensable; clients may not resell or republish the service, its data, or API access.
Several details are missing; they are listed under What we could not confirm.
Compare screening by signal and data path
Compare providers by the fields returned, the evidence behind each signal, and the route used to integrate checks. In general, privacy handling, the pricing meter, and contract conditions also shape whether a screening service fits a workflow.
| Comparison point | What to establish |
|---|---|
| Returned fields | Whether outputs match the decision being made |
| Evidence basis | What informs a signal and how it is described |
| Data handling | Collection, storage, sharing, and deletion practices |
| Integration | Available routes and implementation requirements |
| Billing and terms | Usage measurement, purchase conditions, and cancellation |
Business screening needs match the workflow
IPQS may suit organizations assessing users or transactions when its listed screening scope matches the checks their workflow requires. The vendor says its tools are suited to SMB and enterprise customers.
The service’s listed services include user and payment screening and device fingerprinting. Its stated integration contexts include e-commerce, CMS, and affiliate platforms, so buyers should map the intended checks to their own implementation route.
What we could not confirm
- Checker output: exact fields returned and result presentation
- Signal evidence: reference data and assessment basis
- Privacy and retention: collection, storage, sharing, deletion
- Paid pricing: plan names, prices, allowances, overage terms
- Performance: independent accuracy, false-positive, latency evidence
- Setup: implementation requirements and support response commitments
- Trial controls: duration, volume, feature, and access limits
Questions about IPQS scores and account terms
What data does IPQS say it scans?
IPQS says it scans IPs, email addresses, domains, and URLs for threats and suspicious behavior. In general, screening outputs should be assessed against the fields a buyer needs for a decision; the scan list alone does not establish how a particular result is presented.
How often are threat intelligence feeds updated?
The provider says threat intelligence feeds are updated hourly and provide worldwide coverage. These are vendor descriptions of feed coverage and update frequency, not independent evidence of signal accuracy. Buyers evaluating a feed should establish how its data and outputs fit their own screening process.
Can the threat database run without API data sharing?
IPQS says its on-premise database can be imported into a WAF, firewall, or in-house solution without sharing company data with API endpoints. In general, buyers should confirm which data the chosen deployment handles and how that arrangement aligns with their own privacy requirements.
What account details does IPQS require?
The Terms of Service require an account and password, accurate and current registration information, and a valid business email associated with the client’s organization. The provider also says account sharing or transfer to a third party is prohibited, while two-factor authentication may be enabled.
Can an account holder opt out of arbitration?
IPQS says account holders may opt out of arbitration by sending written notice by email within 30 days after first creating an account, according to its Terms of Service. Buyers reviewing the agreement should read the provision and its stated procedure directly.
Can IPQS be used as a consumer report?
IPQS says its services are not consumer reports and may not be used for purposes covered by the FCRA in place of a consumer report. In general, buyers should match a tool’s stated permitted use to the decision and requirements involved.
Choose by query terms and screening scope
Fits if the listed screening coverage and integration contexts match the checks your workflow requires.
Probably not if refund flexibility, rollover, or proration is essential, since the provider excludes these except where law requires otherwise.
Main risk… query use is metered and the provider’s terms restrict refunds and termination flexibility. Before purchase, check the applicable terms and how the intended requests consume credits.
Sources
Public pages the facts above were taken from, with the date each was read.
How we put this page together
Editorial team of Affiliate Index. The editors at Affiliate Index wrote this page from the public sources listed above, which were read on 2026-10-31. Nobody tried the service in practice. If a source changes, the page is revised.
Last updated:
Right of reply
Representatives of ipqualityscore.com can contest this entry: write to us and attach evidence of the inaccuracy. We correct the entry or remove it once the refutation is documented. Entries are never removed or softened for payment.
- Our contact for replies
- No data available
- Response time
- No data available